When Survival is Called "Crazy": Gabriela Rico Jimenez and the Reality of Reactive Abuse

Gabriela Rico Jimenez is a powerful example of someone who endured horrific trauma, only to have her reactions to that trauma weaponized against her. Labeling her as "crazy" or "psychotic" becomes a convenient way to deflect from the crimes committed against her. Isn't it telling that no one seems to know what really happened to her?

A video from 2009 is circulating online again. It shows a young model, Gabriela Rico Jimenez, in a moment of extreme distress. For many who see it without context, it might be easy to label her reaction as “crazy” or “unstable.” But for those of us who understand the dynamics of abuse, we see something else entirely: a textbook example of reactive abuse.

As the article from Reflection Psychology explains, reactive abuse is not intentional harm. It is a survival response. It occurs when someone who has endured prolonged emotional or psychological abuse—constant mocking, criticism, control—finally reaches a breaking point. They may yell, sob uncontrollably, or physically defend themselves. In that moment, their brain and body, flooded with stress hormones like adrenaline and cortisol, have shifted into survival mode: fight, flight, freeze, or fawn.

Gabriela Rico Jimenez is a powerful example of someone who went through horrific trauma, only to have her reaction to that trauma weaponized against her. This is how the cycle works: the abuser provokes and triggers until the real victim reacts, then blames the real victim for that reaction, using it as “proof” of instability. The real victim is left isolated, ashamed, and questioning their own reality, while the real abuser is protected and, in a cruel twist, often treated as the wronged party.

This isn't just a dynamic in personal relationships. It is a reverse illusion happening everywhere—from the highest offices of power to the smallest corners of our communities. We see it when institutions discredit survivors to cover up crimes. We see it when a person’s understandable anger at injustice is dismissed as being “too emotional.” The pattern is always the same: the one who finally breaks under pressure is labeled the problem, deflecting attention from the one who applied the pressure in the first place.

Isn’t it telling that so few people ask what really happened to Gabriela? What was the provocation that led to that moment? What was the history of control or abuse that pushed her to that breaking point? The focus on her reaction, rather than the cause, is a feature, not a bug, of how abuse is protected.

For anyone who sees themselves in this dynamic—who has ever felt like “the crazy one” or been told their reaction to pain is the real issue—please know this: Reactive abuse does not mean you are abusive. It is a sign that you have been traumatized and pushed into survival mode. Healing is possible. It begins with recognizing the cycle, seeking trauma-informed support, and reclaiming the truth: that your pain was real, and your survival was never the problem.

Malignant narcissists are masters at this reverse illusion.

Click HERE to read more blogs about narcissists' reverse illusions