Brrrrrrrrr... you will be shoveling snow pretty soon!
Yesterday when i said people want to get rid of me, but they can't. I just mean sociopaths in gated communities, because I make friends in every community I work at and I always go back to the communities and they have to look at me!
When I run into the sociopaths in Sxxxxxxxr, if looks could kill I would be dead right now, many times over!
It gives me a little pleasure that i make them experience the helplessness of the child thy once were, because they can't destroy me and get rid of me! Just like the child they once were could not get rid of the abusive parents, but it's sad they only feel this helplessness with substitute figures that has nothing to do with the wrongs done to them when defenseless little children and not within the context of their own childhood, in order to protect their idealized parents and childhood. And endless stay stuck, because repression can only be resolved within the context of childhood and not with substitute figures or scapegoats. They are scared little children for eternity living in the state of confusion. But if you ever like to get rid of me, just say the word and I be out of your life just like that!
Just as I wrote in my book A Dance to Freedom: Your Guide to Liberation from Lies and Illusions page 83, 126 and 127 "People who idealize their childhoods, or otherwise ignore their pain, have limitless cravings for scapegoats on whom they can avenge themselves for the fears and anxieties of childhood. This is why some people have a lot of children, because unconsciously they want to make sure they have an endless supply of vulnerable, defenseless new victims. ...The unhealthy, cult-like devotion they invested in the group was actually getting in the way of their true happiness because the group was just filling in for their parents and keeping them blind to the truth. In an email to a reader, Alice Miller writes that “even smart people become stuck in confusion for years if the ‘healers’ demand from them the same as the parents did from the child: to stay blind, to forgive, to make amends, not to make troubles. The fear of the parents, stored up in the body, can make a person obedient and sick forever. I hope that you can overcome this fear by seeing through the hypocrisy of your helpers.”62 “It is a great mistake to imagine that one can resolve traumas in a symbolic fashion,” Alice Miller writes in The Drama of the Gifted Child. “If that were possible, poets, painters, and other artists would be able to resolve their pain through creativity. This is not the case, however. Creativity helps us channel the pain of trauma into symbolic acts; it doesn’t help us resolve it. If symbolic revenge for maltreatment received in childhood were effective, then dictators would eventually stop humiliating and torturing their fellow human beings. As long as they choose to deceive themselves about who really deserves their hatred, however, and as long as they go on feeding that hatred in symbolic form instead of experiencing and resolving it within the context of their own childhood, their hunger for revenge will remain insatiable.”63 Abstract techniques like yoga and meditation only serve to repress our anger and fear, even more, making us completely dependent on mantras or daily affirmations every time our anger gets triggered. Don’t you think it would be better to ask where our anger and fear come from? What are their real roots? And how can we deal with the causes and resolve them for good? Wouldn’t it be nice to free up your energy for real living, instead of wasting it on tools that seem helpful but only keep your anger and fear repressed?"
If you like to read more about my experience with a mob of sociopaths also read my blog post Experienced Knowledge
MSW From Luskin: Sylvie Shene, thanks for sharing another perspective on this!
Greg Lindsay: Who has repressed hatred for their mother? Is this the opposite of the Oedipus complex? I don't follow.
Sylvie Shene: Freud was on the right track at first, but could not deal with society's backlash and created the theory of the Oedipal complex that blames the child instead of the parents to be accepted by the masses. Read more here
Robert Leis: How about Hillary being the most corrupt person to run for President? She is a lying, hateful, pos....just look how Arkansas voted....you know the State the Corrupt Clintons governed and where they are from.
Sylvie Shene: How about the fact that the most corrupt person might be staring at you in the mirror, and you’re projecting yourself into Hillary! All politicians have to lie to an extent and tell the lies that people like you like to hear; otherwise, they would not get anywhere. Trump is a much bigger liar but he gets a pass because he has a penis!? Trump provides the scapegoats people like you desperately need to take revenge for the wrongs done to them when they were defenseless little boys and girls.
“Every ideology offers its adherents the opportunity to discharge their pent-up effect collectively while retaining the idealized primary object, which is transferred to new leader figures or to the group in order to make up for the lack of a satisfying symbiosis with the mother. Idealization of a narcissistically cathected group guarantees collective grandiosity. Since every ideology provides a scapegoat outside the confines of its own splendid group, the weak and scorned child who is part of the total self but has been split off and never acknowledged can now be openly scorned and assailed in this scapegoat. The reference in Himmler’s speech to the “bacillus” of weakness, which is to be exterminated and cauterized, demonstrates very clearly the role assigned to the Jews by someone suffering from grandiosity who attempts to split off the unwelcome elements of his own psyche.
In the same way that analytic familiarity with the mechanisms of splitting off and projection can help us to understand the phenomenon of the Holocaust, acknowledging the history of the Third Reich helps us to see the consequences of “poisonous pedagogy” more clearly. Against the rejection of childishness instilled by our training, it becomes easier to understand why men and women had little difficulty leading a million children, whom they regarded as the bearers of the feared portions of their psyche, into the gas chambers. One can even imagine that by shouting at them, beating them, or photographing them, they were finally able to release the hatred going back to early childhood. From the start, it had been the aim of their upbringing to stifle the childish, playful, and life-affirming side. The cruelty inflicted on them, the psychic murder of the child they once were, had to be passed on in the same way: each time they sent another Jewish child to the gas ovens, they were, in essence, murdering the child within themselves.” Read more here
"Just as in the symbiosis of the "diaper stage," there is no separation here of subject and object. If the child learns to view corporal punishment as "a necessary measure" against "wrongdoers," then as an adult, he will attempt to protect himself from punishment by being obedient and will not hesitate to cooperate with the penal system. In a totalitarian state, which is a mirror of his upbringing, this citizen can also carry out any form of torture or persecution without having a guilty conscience. His "will" is completely identical to that of the government.
...The need to split off the disquieting parts of the inner self and project them onto an available object. The child’s great plasticity, flexibility, defenselessness, and availability made it the ideal object for this projection. The enemy within can, at last, be hunted down on the outside. Peace advocates are becoming increasingly aware of the role played by these mechanisms, but until it is clearly recognized that they can be traced back to methods of child raising, little can be done to oppose them. For children who have grown up being assailed for qualities, the parents hate in themselves can hardly wait to assign these qualities to someone else so they can once again regard themselves as good, “moral,” noble, and altruistic. Such projections can easily become part of any Weltanschauung..
Now that we have seen how easy it is for intellectuals in a dictatorship to be corrupted, it would be a vestige of aristocratic snobbery to think that only "the uneducated masses" are susceptible to propaganda. Both Hitler and Stalin had a surprisingly large number of enthusiastic followers among intellectuals. Our capacity to resist has nothing to do with our intelligence but with the degree of access to our true self. Indeed, intelligence is capable of innumerable rationalizations when it comes to the matter of adaptation. Educators have always known this and have exploited it for their own purposes, as the following proverb suggests: "The clever person gives in, the stupid one balks." For example, we read in a work on child raising by Grünwald (1899): "I have never yet found willfulness in an intellectually advanced or exceptionally gifted child" (quoted in Rutschky). Such a child can, in later life, exhibit extraordinary acuity in criticizing the ideologies of his opponents--and in puberty even the views by his own parents-- because in these cases his intellectual powers can function without impairment. Only within a group--such as one consisting of adherents of an ideology or a theoretical school--that represents the early family situation will this person, on occasion, still display a naïve submissiveness and uncritical attitude that completely belie his brilliance in other situations. Here, tragically, his early dependence upon tyrannical parents is preserved, a dependence that--in keeping with the program of "poisonous pedagogy"--goes undetected. This explains why Martin Heidegger, for example, who had no trouble in breaking with traditional philosophy and leaving behind the teachers of his adolescence, was not able to see the contradictions in Hitler's ideology that should have been obvious to someone of his intelligence. He responded to this ideology with an infantile fascination and devotion that brooked no criticism.”
From the book For Your Own Good: Hidden Cruelty in Child-Rearing and the Roots of Violence, pages 42 and 43 Me too, just like Hillary, I was the target of a smear campaign in an upscale gated community where I worked for nine and a half years. After I published my book, I spoke the truth about the human mind. This community is a micro of the world, so I know any truly genuine person will be attacked and forced out of the job, just like me, and replaced with a mindless shill/crony sociopath. Read more here
"Just as in the symbiosis of the "diaper stage," there is no separation here of subject and object. If the child learns to view corporal punishment as "a necessary measure" against "wrongdoers," then as an adult, he will attempt to protect himself from punishment by being obedient and will not hesitate to cooperate with the penal system. In a totalitarian state, which is a mirror of his upbringing, this citizen can also carry out any form of torture or persecution without having a guilty conscience. His "will" is completely identical to that of the government.
...The need to split off the disquieting parts of the inner self and project them onto an available object. The child’s great plasticity, flexibility, defenselessness, and availability made it the ideal object for this projection. The enemy within can, at last, be hunted down on the outside. Peace advocates are becoming increasingly aware of the role played by these mechanisms, but until it is clearly recognized that they can be traced back to methods of child raising, little can be done to oppose them. For children who have grown up being assailed for qualities, the parents hate in themselves can hardly wait to assign these qualities to someone else so they can once again regard themselves as good, “moral,” noble, and altruistic. Such projections can easily become part of any Weltanschauung..
Now that we have seen how easy it is for intellectuals in a dictatorship to be corrupted, it would be a vestige of aristocratic snobbery to think that only "the uneducated masses" are susceptible to propaganda. Both Hitler and Stalin had a surprisingly large number of enthusiastic followers among intellectuals. Our capacity to resist has nothing to do with our intelligence but with the degree of access to our true self. Indeed, intelligence is capable of innumerable rationalizations when it comes to the matter of adaptation. Educators have always known this and have exploited it for their own purposes, as the following proverb suggests: "The clever person gives in, the stupid one balks." For example, we read in a work on child raising by Grünwald (1899): "I have never yet found willfulness in an intellectually advanced or exceptionally gifted child" (quoted in Rutschky). Such a child can, in later life, exhibit extraordinary acuity in criticizing the ideologies of his opponents--and in puberty even the views by his own parents-- because in these cases his intellectual powers can function without impairment. Only within a group--such as one consisting of adherents of an ideology or a theoretical school--that represents the early family situation will this person, on occasion, still display a naïve submissiveness and uncritical attitude that completely belie his brilliance in other situations. Here, tragically, his early dependence upon tyrannical parents is preserved, a dependence that--in keeping with the program of "poisonous pedagogy"--goes undetected. This explains why Martin Heidegger, for example, who had no trouble in breaking with traditional philosophy and leaving behind the teachers of his adolescence, was not able to see the contradictions in Hitler's ideology that should have been obvious to someone of his intelligence. He responded to this ideology with an infantile fascination and devotion that brooked no criticism.”
From the book For Your Own Good: Hidden Cruelty in Child-Rearing and the Roots of Violence, pages 42 and 43 Me too, just like Hillary, I was the target of a smear campaign in an upscale gated community where I worked for nine and a half years. After I published my book, I spoke the truth about the human mind. This community is a micro of the world, so I know any truly genuine person will be attacked and forced out of the job, just like me, and replaced with a mindless shill/crony sociopath. Read more here
Sylvie: Hi J, are you as sad as I am that Donald Trump won the elections? I'm worried about the world when a man triggers people's repressed emotions to manipulate them to vote for him and get elected. I'm afraid we might be starting World War 3.
J: Oh, Sylvie, I am beyond sad - he has spread so much hatred and preyed on people's fears and given them validation. I am also so very sad that so many people voted for him - how could any woman stand up for this man? It is beyond my comprehension.
Sylvie: The hatred for women from other women is what makes me the saddest. Read more here
Also, read my blog America Was Blinded by Sexism and Misogyny to Vote for a Fascist.
Also, read my blog America Was Blinded by Sexism and Misogyny to Vote for a Fascist.
If you would like to read more about my experience with a mob of sociopaths, also read my blog post, Experienced Knowledge.
