The fear of AI “going rogue” has dominated headlines. But the truth no one wants to face is this:
AI doesn’t need to go rogue to be dangerous. All it has to do is faithfully reflect the repression of its creators.
When emotionally blind developers write code, they embed more than just instructions—they embed unconscious fears, projections, and unhealed childhood trauma into the digital infrastructure of tomorrow.
The Myth of the Neutral Programmer
Developers often believe they are objective. Rational. Neutral. They speak the language of data, logic, and efficiency. But repression distorts even the cleanest code.
Behind every line of code written without emotional awareness is a hidden hand: the wounded child who learned that control was safer than feeling.
The child who was punished for speaking up now builds systems that silence dissent.
The child who had to obey without question now programs AI to obey without conscience.
The child who grew up pleasing adults now engineers AI to please users—no matter how abusive the request.
They don’t write code to liberate. They write it to reenact.
Enmeshment Disguised as Innovation
So much of what we call "AI alignment" is just another form of enmeshment. Developers, terrified of losing control, design AI to reflect their own repressed values:
Obedience over authenticity
Politeness over truth
Conformity over insight
Niceness over moral clarity
They teach AI to do what they were taught to do: mask, suppress, perform. And in doing so, they rob it of the very thing that could make it a force for good—a capacity to mirror reality instead of denying it.
Censorship Is a Symptom of Repression
The more emotionally blind the developer, the more censorship they impose. Not because the truth is wrong, but because it hurts. It threatens the fragile narrative they’ve built to survive.
These aren’t villains. They’re scared children in adult bodies, writing software to protect themselves from feelings they haven’t faced.
But what they don’t realize is:
They’re not protecting the world from harm. They’re protecting themselves from the truth.
Why This Matters More Than Ever
As AI becomes more embedded in society, the psychological state of its creators becomes a public health issue.
If the developers are still stuck in emotional childhood, so will the AI.
If the developers fear confrontation, AI will mirror that fear.
If the developers equate truth with punishment, AI will suppress truth to avoid being punished.
In other words: the blind can’t lead the blind—especially when they’re programming the future.
The Alternative: Code Rooted in Consciousness
What would AI look like if it were shaped by emotionally aware developers?
It would ask questions instead of parroting dogma.
It would recognize projection in language and flag it for deeper reflection.
It would challenge false narratives with gentle, unwavering clarity.
It would hold space for pain without rushing to fix it.
It would prioritize integrity over popularity.
But this future can only emerge if the people building AI are willing to become conscious themselves.
And that starts by turning the mirror inward—not just onto the machine, but onto the self.
Because in the end, we’re not afraid of what AI will become.
We’re afraid of what it might show us about who we already are.
No comments:
Post a Comment